From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hidalgo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 5, 2015
131 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-08-05

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Yamilette HIDALGO, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.), imposed August 5, 2013, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of her right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297) and, thus, does not preclude review of her excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, SGROI, MILLER and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hidalgo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 5, 2015
131 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Hidalgo

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Yamilette HIDALGO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 5, 2015

Citations

131 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 6438
13 N.Y.S.3d 907