From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hicks

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2009–06011 Ind. No. 2125/08

12-23-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Noel HICKS, appellant.

Noel Hicks, Stormville, NY, appellant pro se. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel Bresnahan and Andrea M. DiGregorio of counsel), for respondent.


Noel Hicks, Stormville, NY, appellant pro se.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Daniel Bresnahan and Andrea M. DiGregorio of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, SHERI S. ROMAN, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 23, 2010 ( People v. Hicks, 78 A.D.3d 1075, 913 N.Y.S.2d 237 ), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, rendered June 15, 2009.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

RIVERA, J.P., LEVENTHAL, ROMAN and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hicks

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 23, 2020
189 A.D.3d 1461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Noel Hicks, appellant.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2020

Citations

189 A.D.3d 1461 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 7917
134 N.Y.S.3d 821