From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hicks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 4, 2018
160 A.D.3d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2009–05967 Ind. No. 3364–07

04-04-2018

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Albert R. HICKS, appellant.

Albert Hicks, named herein as Albert R. Hicks, Dannemora, NY, appellant pro se. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Glenn Green of counsel), for respondent.


Albert Hicks, named herein as Albert R. Hicks, Dannemora, NY, appellant pro se.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Glenn Green of counsel), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, BETSY BARROS, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 11, 2011 ( People v. Hicks, 88 A.D.3d 817, 930 N.Y.S.2d 658 ), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered May 13, 2009

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 ; People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., ROMAN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hicks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 4, 2018
160 A.D.3d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Albert R. HICKS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 4, 2018

Citations

160 A.D.3d 661 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
70 N.Y.S.3d 867