From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hicks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2017
154 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-19-2017

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry HICKS, Defendant–Appellant.

Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Katherine M.A. Pecore of Counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Julia P. Cohen of Counsel), for respondent.


Rosemary Herbert, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Katherine M.A. Pecore of Counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Julia P. Cohen of Counsel), for respondent.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

MANZANET–DANIELS, J.P., MAZZARELLI, MOSKOWITZ, KAHN, and KERN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hicks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 19, 2017
154 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Harry HICKS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 19, 2017

Citations

154 A.D.3d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
61 N.Y.S.3d 898