From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1980
79 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

December 23, 1980

Appeal from the Niagara County Court.

Present — Cardamone, J.P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to Niagara County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: Defendant was indicted for robbery, first degree, burglary, first degree, and grand larceny, third degree. At the conclusion of plea negotiations, defendant pleaded guilty to robbery, third degree, in full satisfaction of the indictment. Robbery, first degree, and burglary, first degree, are class B violent felonies (Penal Law, § 70.02, subd 1, par [a]). Accordingly, defendant was required to plead, under the statute as it then existed, to a violent felony offense (CPL 220.10, subd 5, par [d]). Robbery, third degree, is not a violent felony offense. The judgment is based on an illegal plea and must be vacated (see Matter of Wadsworth v. Mogavero, 71 A.D.2d 157; People v. Bartley, 60 A.D.2d 283, affd 47 N.Y.2d 965).


Summaries of

People v. Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1980
79 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Hicks

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY HICKS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1980

Citations

79 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Thomasula

The bargain violated the statute (see, People v Banville, supra; People v Cook, 93 A.D.2d 942). In the usual…

PEOPLE v. RAMIREZ

Therefore, accepting this disposition would create an appellate issue that would likely result in a reversal…