From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hickey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 22, 2023
222 A.D.3d 1429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

980 KA 22-01196

12-22-2023

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey R. HICKEY, Defendant-Appellant.

HAYDEN M. DADD, CONFLICT DEFENDER, GENESEO (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. GREGORY J. MCCAFFREY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, GENESEO (JOSHUA J. TONRA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


HAYDEN M. DADD, CONFLICT DEFENDER, GENESEO (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GREGORY J. MCCAFFREY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, GENESEO (JOSHUA J. TONRA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CURRAN, MONTOUR, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the first degree ( Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.10 [1] ), defendant contends that his statutory right to a speedy trial was violated inasmuch as County Court erred in denying that part of his omnibus motion seeking to strike the People's certificate of compliance as invalid. By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited review of his contention regarding the motion to strike (see People v. Smith , 217 A.D.3d 1578, 1578, 190 N.Y.S.3d 557 [4th Dept. 2023] ). Moreover, defendant's statutory speedy trial contention is unpreserved for our review (see People v. Hardy , 47 N.Y.2d 500, 505, 419 N.Y.S.2d 49, 392 N.E.2d 1233 [1979] ; People v. Valentin , 183 A.D.3d 1271, 1272, 123 N.Y.S.3d 376 [4th Dept. 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1049, 127 N.Y.S.3d 846, 151 N.E.3d 527 [2020] ; People v. Pohl , 160 A.D.3d 1453, 1454, 76 N.Y.S.3d 337 [4th Dept. 2018], lv denied 32 N.Y.3d 940, 84 N.Y.S.3d 867, 109 N.E.3d 1167 [2018] ; cf. People v. Gaskin , 214 A.D.3d 1353, 1355, 186 N.Y.S.3d 467 [4th Dept. 2023] ), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c] ; Valentin , 183 A.D.3d at 1272, 123 N.Y.S.3d 376 ; Pohl , 160 A.D.3d at 1454, 76 N.Y.S.3d 337 ). Finally, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.


Summaries of

People v. Hickey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Dec 22, 2023
222 A.D.3d 1429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

People v. Hickey

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey R. HICKEY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 22, 2023

Citations

222 A.D.3d 1429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
222 A.D.3d 1429

Citing Cases

People v. Dunn

Defendant further contends in appeal Nos. 1 and 3 that although the People indicated their readiness for…