From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Heyward

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2021
198 A.D.3d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2019-03583, 2019-03584, 2019-03585, 2019-03586 Ind. Nos. 1776/18, 10241/18 Docket Nos. 10244/18, 26047/18

10-20-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Erik HEYWARD, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Hannah Gladstein of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnette Traill and Sharon Y. Brodt of counsel; Jordan Miller on the memorandum), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Hannah Gladstein of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnette Traill and Sharon Y. Brodt of counsel; Jordan Miller on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Evelyn L. Braun, J.), all imposed February 20, 2019, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY, IANNACCI and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Heyward

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2021
198 A.D.3d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Heyward

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Erik HEYWARD, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 825

Citing Cases

People v. Carter

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to…

People v. Carter

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to…