People v. Herron

8 Citing cases

  1. People v. Lockridge

    No. 149073 (Mich. Jul. 29, 2015)

    The defendant in Herron subsequently filed an application for leave to appeal in this Court, and that application is being held in abeyance pending the outcome of this case. People v Herron, 846 NW2d 924 (Mich, 2014). The defendant filed an application for leave to appeal in this Court.

  2. People v. Lockridge

    498 Mich. 358 (Mich. 2015)   Cited 2,207 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Michigan's sentencing guideline scheme violates the Sixth Amendment

    The defendant in Herron subsequently filed an application for leave to appeal in this Court, and that application is being held in abeyance pending the outcome of this case. People v. Herron, 846 N.W.2d 924 (Mich., 2014). Lockridge, 304 Mich.App. 278, 284, 849 N.W.2d 388 (2014) (opinion by O'Connell, J.).

  3. People v. Schlenkerman

    No. 320501 (Mich. Ct. App. Jul. 28, 2015)

    The defendant's application for leave to appeal in Herron was held in abeyance for the Supreme Court's decision in Lockridge. People v Herron, 846 NW2d 924 (2014). Until Lockridge is decided, this Court must follow Herron, 303 Mich App at 403-404.

  4. People v. Hallak

    No. 317863 (Mich. Ct. App. May. 28, 2015)

    Our Supreme Court has held the defendant's application for leave to appeal in Herron in abeyance pending its decision in People v Lockridge, 496 Mich 852 (2014). See People v Herron, 846 NW2d 924 (2014). C. LIFETIME ELECTRONIC MONITORING

  5. People v. Hallak

    310 Mich. App. 555 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 43 times
    In Hallak, 310 Mich.App. at 573, the Court acknowledged that lifetime electronic monitoring addresses the significant concerns of rehabilitation and recidivism.

    Our Supreme Court has held the defendant's application for leave to appeal in Herron in abeyance pending its decision in People v. Lockridge, 496 Mich. 852, 846 N.W.2d 925 (2014). See People v. Herron, 846 N.W.2d 924 (Mich.2014). C. LIFETIME ELECTRONIC MONITORING

  6. People v. McGilary

    No. 319975 (Mich. Ct. App. Apr. 23, 2015)

    People v Lockridge, 496 Mich 852 (2014). People v Herron, 846 NW2d 924 (2014). --------

  7. People v. Edwards

    No. 318092 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2015)   Cited 1 times

    Our Supreme Court has granted leave in Lockridge, 496 Mich 852 (2014), and has also entered an order holding the application for leave to appeal in Herron in abeyance pending its decision in Lockridge. People v Herron, 846 NW2d 924 (2014). A Supreme Court order granting leave to appeal does not diminish or alter the precedential effect of a published opinion of the Court of Appeals.

  8. People v. Duenaz

    306 Mich. App. 85 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 228 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In People v Duenaz, 306 Mich.App. 85, 95; 854 N.W.2d 531 (2014), this Court stated that the purpose underlying MRE 803(4) is the "existence of (1) the self-interested motivation to speak the truth to treating physicians in order to receive proper medical care, and (2) the reasonable necessity of the statement to the diagnosis and treatment of the patient."

    Our Supreme Court has held the defendant's application for leave to appeal in Herron in abeyance pending its decision in People v. Lockridge, 496 Mich. 852, 846 N.W.2d 925 (2014). See People v. Herron, 846 N.W.2d 924 (2014). VIII. SUMMARY