Opinion
May 1, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Under the circumstances, he has no basis now to complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). In any event, the sentence imposed was neither unduly harsh nor excessive and was a proper exercise of the court's discretion (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.