From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hernandez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2021
198 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

14356 Ind. No. 4048/17 Case No. 2019–2219

10-14-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony HERNANDEZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Ben A. Schatz of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Ben A. Schatz of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jonathon Krois of counsel), for respondent.

Gische, J.P., Moulton, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (James M. Burke, J. at motions to dismiss; Ann E. Scherzer, J. at plea and sentencing), rendered February 8, 2019, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2½ years, unanimously affirmed.

By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contention that the grand jury proceedings were impaired by the prosecutor's failure to disclose to the grand jury certain prior inconsistent statements of the testifying officer (see People v. Hansen, 95 N.Y.2d 227, 230, 715 N.Y.S.2d 369, 738 N.E.2d 773 [2000] ; People v. Simmons, 94 A.D.3d 414, 941 N.Y.S.2d 488 [1st Dept. 2012], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 1001, 951 N.Y.S.2d 477, 975 N.E.2d 923 [2012] ; People v. Bishop, 1 A.D.3d 112, 766 N.Y.S.2d 356 [1st Dept. 2003], lv denied 1 N.Y.3d 568, 775 N.Y.S.2d 785, 807 N.E.2d 898 [2003] ). In the alternative, we find no impairment of the integrity of the grand jury proceeding (see People v. Mitchell, 82 N.Y.2d 509, 605 N.Y.S.2d 655, 626 N.E.2d 630 [1993] ). The omitted statements amounted to minor impeachment evidence that created no possibility of prejudice to defendant by their omission (see Bishop, 1 A.D.3d at 112, 766 N.Y.S.2d 356 ).

In any event, the only remedy requested by defendant is dismissal of the indictment with prejudice, that is, without leave to re-present, and he expressly requests that if this Court denies that remedy, it should affirm. We find no basis for such a dismissal.


Summaries of

People v. Hernandez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2021
198 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony HERNANDEZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 14, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 592

Citing Cases

People v. Arias

By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited review of his claims that the evidence presented to the grand jury…