From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 1, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Carey, J.).


Defendant was charged with selling three vials of crack cocaine to an undercover officer and for possessing, with intent to sell, two vials that were in her possession upon her arrest. Defendant argued that she was merely a drug user, denied selling narcotics to the undercover, and maintained that the two vials in her possession were for personal use. She claimed that a nearby female companion had actually been the seller.

Evidence of uncharged crimes is admissible if it helps to establish some element of the crime under consideration or is relevant to a contested issue in the case and its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect ( People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233, 241-242). It is admissible to establish, for example, knowledge, intent, motive, identity or to provide background information, or if it is "inextricably interwoven" with crimes charged in the indictment ( People v. Vails, 43 N.Y.2d 364, 368; see, People v Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264, 293; People v. Crandall, 67 N.Y.2d 111, 116-117; People v. Rodriguez, 181 A.D.2d 750, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 1053). Contrary to defendant's contentions, evidence relating to uncharged sales of narcotics was properly admitted since it was highly probative of defendant's intent to sell the two vials which she possessed. Because these criminal acts were close in time and inextricably interwoven with the charged crimes, their probative value outweighed any prejudice.

The hearing court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress the drugs and money recovered from her upon her arrest. The backup team had reasonable suspicion to detain defendant and to subsequently arrest her where the arresting officer received a reasonably specific description of the seller from the undercover officer. Going to the location, the arresting officer identified the defendant, who was wearing the same clothing as had been described. Thereafter, the undercover officer confirmed that defendant was the seller in a drive-by identification.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1995
216 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RUTH HERNANDEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 11 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 368

Citing Cases

People v. Vann

We also reject defendant's contention that County Court erred in allowing evidence of certain uncharged…

People v. Terry

Were we to review them, we would find that the remarks were a fair response to the defense raised and defense…