Opinion
October 15, 1990
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fertig, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic.
In her motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.17 (i), the defendant confined herself to arguing that the sentence imposed upon her for the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree was illegal. This argument is academic since the maximum term of imprisonment imposed by the sentencing court for this crime has expired. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.