Opinion
March 31, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward M. Davidowitz, J.).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Malizia, 62 N.Y.2d 755, cert denied 469 U.S. 932), we find that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict. Moreover, upon an independent review of the facts, we find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). The issues raised by defendant concerning the credibility of the prosecution witnesses and the absence of additional drugs or buy money on his person when arrested were properly placed before the jury for their resolution (People v Mosley, 112 A.D.2d 812, 814, affd 67 N.Y.2d 985). After considering the relative force of the conflicting testimony and the competing inferences that may be drawn therefrom, we find no reason on the record before us to disturb the jury's determination. We have considered defendant's arguments that the court erroneously considered matters not on the record, misinterpreted his criminal record, and for other reasons, imposed a sentence that is unduly harsh, and find these arguments to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Kassal, JJ.