From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1991
172 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 25, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Rene Uviller, J.).


We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction", we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and with statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms." (People v. Felman, 141 A.D.2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 918.)

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1991
172 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Herman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO HERMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
568 N.Y.S.2d 786

Citing Cases

Royal Waste Servs. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co.

However, neither plaintiffs nor defendant Interstate are entitled to summary judgment. Where an insured makes…