From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hereida

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1992
187 A.D.2d 272 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

November 5, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.).


Defendant's plea allocution was adequate inasmuch as he admitted possession and dominion and control of narcotics in his codefendant's apartment (People v Sierra, 45 N.Y.2d 56, 60). In any event, his plea to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, a lesser included offense of one of the crimes charged in the indictment, served to forfeit his right to challenge the factual basis of the plea (People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97, 108; People v Clairborne, 29 N.Y.2d 950).

Further, we find that defendant's sentence was not excessive.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Hereida

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 5, 1992
187 A.D.2d 272 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Hereida

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FREDDIE HEREIDA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 5, 1992

Citations

187 A.D.2d 272 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Hill

Although a guilty plea does not preclude the right to raise certain jurisdictional or constitutional defects,…

People v. Heretakis

The experienced narcotics officer had probable cause to arrest defendant when he observed defendant remove…