Opinion
May 30, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention regarding the court's failure to instruct the jury as to the limited purpose of the evidence of the complainant's prompt complaint of rape is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Parsons, 150 A.D.2d 614; People v Gomez, 112 A.D.2d 445). The defendant's remaining contention is also unpreserved for appellate review. Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.