From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 1999
264 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

September 28, 1999

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore, J.), rendered April 27, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 10 to 20 years, unanimously affirmed.

Lisa I. Cuevas, for Respondent.

David J. Klein, for Defendant-Respondent.

SULLIVAN, J.P., NARDELLI, WALLACH, ANDRIAS, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by any of the prosecutor's questions during cross-examination. The questions claimed by defendant to have suggested prior bad acts did not violate any pretrial ruling and were properly posed to explore credibility issues raised by defendant's direct testimony (see, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, 136, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976). By failing to object, or by failing to request further relief after objections were sustained, defendant has not preserved his remaining challenges to the prosecutor's cross-examination and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find the prosecutor's question suggesting that defendant did not offer truthful testimony to be improper but harmless, and we would reject the remaining claims.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 28, 1999
264 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD HENRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 28, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 672 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 21

Citing Cases

Simmons v. Mazzuca

Consequently, they are not preserved for our review."); People v. Henry, 264 A.D.2d 672, 672, 696 N.Y.S.2d…

People v. Pross

Thus, no such identification testimony was admitted. Furthermore, defendant did not thereafter seek a…