From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2006
29 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2004-04547.

May 16, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), rendered May 12, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Sholom J. Twersky of counsel; Robert W. Ho on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

While on probation for two drug-related felonies, the defendant was arrested and indicted for selling heroin to an undercover officer within 1,000 feet of a school. He subsequently entered a plea of guilty to one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. The court promised that if he successfully completed a DTAP program (Drug Treatment Alternative-to-Prison Program), the plea would be vacated and the indictment would be dismissed. The court warned, however, that if he failed to complete the program, he would face a sentence of 4½ to 9 years' imprisonment as a second felony offender. The defendant was fully allocuted and, upon his admission, was adjudicated a second felony offender. He was subsequently discharged from one residential drug treatment program for noncompliance, and left a second residential program without permission and against clinical advice. He was thereafter arrested for another drug sale. The court sentenced him to a term of 4½ to 9 years' imprisonment.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal from the sentence imposed was ineffective ( see People v. Brown, 13 AD3d 548 [2004]; People v. Williams, 258 AD2d 544; People v. Rose, 236 AD2d 637; People v. Rolon, 220 AD2d 543). Contrary to the defendant's contention, however, the sentence was neither unconstitutional nor excessive ( see People v. Moore, 261 AD2d 421; People v. James, 251 AD2d 208; People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).


Summaries of

People v. Henry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2006
29 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ADONIS HENRY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3917
815 N.Y.S.2d 209

Citing Cases

People v. Joseph

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal from his…