Opinion
October 15, 1990
Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On the instant direct appeal from the judgment of conviction of the County Court, Rockland County, the defendant argues that (1) the County Court made a promise at the plea hearing that the sentence imposed would be concurrent to any sentence to be imposed in New York County for violation of probation, and (2) the sentencing court in the Supreme Court, New York County (Rothwax, J.), instead, subsequently imposed a consecutive sentence upon him. Accordingly, the defendant argues that his guilty plea in the County Court, Rockland County, was induced by an unfulfilled promise and must be vacated. However, the defendant's proper remedy with respect to this argument is by way of a motion pursuant to CPL article 440 and not by direct appeal from the judgment of conviction of the County Court, Rockland County (see, People v. Alvarado, 160 A.D.2d 1012; People v Pinaud, 132 A.D.2d 580). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.