From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Henriquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 1989
150 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

May 18, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Carol Berkman, J., John Bradley, J.


In People v Madera ( 125 A.D.2d 238), we held that the codefendant passenger in the vehicle driven by appellant had standing to contest its stop, and that codefendant's motion papers raised sufficient factual allegations to warrant a hearing pursuant to CPL 710.60(4). Inasmuch as appellant relied upon codefendant's motion papers to assert his own challenge to the stop, the People concede, and we agree, that a hearing is likewise required in this matter.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Kassal, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Henriquez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 1989
150 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Henriquez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FELIX HENRIQUEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 18, 1989

Citations

150 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Way

It would appear that the Legislature, in enacting Penal Law § 220.50, intended to permit prosecution of…

People v. Rodriguez

In fact, a number of courts have permitted Penal Law § 220.50 charges to stand where the paraphernalia was…