Opinion
January 13, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.).
Judgment affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and do not find that the arresting officer's testimony was either incredible as a matter of law or patently tailored to avoid constitutional objections (see, People v Berrios, 28 N.Y.2d 361; People v Brown, 107 A.D.2d 754; People v Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86). Accordingly, the People have sustained their burden of going forward in the first instance and showing the legality of the police conduct. Gibbons, J.P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.