From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hendrickson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 7, 1937
20 Cal.App.2d 748 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 11391, 11392, 11393.

May 7, 1937.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Robert W. Kenny, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

U.S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Attorney-General, for Appellant.

Erwin P. Werner and Edward Linder for Respondents.


MEMORANDUM CASE.


These three cases are similar in the pleadings, except as to names and amounts, and in the judgments rendered, to the case of People v. Tux Winery Co., No. 11351, this day decided ( ante, p. 700 [ 67 P.2d 752]) by this court. The appeals were taken five weeks later. The parties have now stipulated in writing that these cases may be submitted for decision on the briefs on file in the Tux Winery Company case.

[1] For the reasons stated in the decision in that case, we also affirm the judgments in these cases.

Judgments affirmed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Hendrickson

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
May 7, 1937
20 Cal.App.2d 748 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
Case details for

People v. Hendrickson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. PAUL HENDRICKSON, Respondent. THE PEOPLE…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: May 7, 1937

Citations

20 Cal.App.2d 748 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
67 P.2d 754