following Rhinehart with regard to the initial stop, before determining that because defendant escaped police custody, he was not seized, within the meaning of the fourth amendment, at the time that he dropped the gun he sought to suppress
Summary of this case from People v. SandersNO. 114040
2012-05-30
People v. Carl Henderson
Lower Court: 2012 IL App (1st) 101494, 358 Ill.Dec. 806, 965 N.E.2d 1285
Disposition: Allowed.
following Rhinehart with regard to the initial stop, before determining that because defendant escaped police custody, he was not seized, within the meaning of the fourth amendment, at the time that he dropped the gun he sought to suppress
Summary of this case from People v. SandersFull title:People v. Carl Henderson
Court:Supreme Court of Illinois
Date published: May 30, 2012
However, in Rhinehart, the record did not contain evidence indicating that the informant had seen the gun or…