From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the delay of the proceedings to conduct plea negotiations, upon the consent of defense counsel, was not chargeable to the People for purposes of CPL 30.30 ( see, People v. Chu Zhu, 245 A.D.2d 296; People v. Crogan, 237 A.D.2d 745).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1998
248 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BARRY HENDERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 485 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 511

Citing Cases

People v. Rose

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice,…

People v. R.G.

The People maintain that the time during which plea negotiations are pending is excludable so long as the…