From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Heidgen

Court of Appeals of New York
Nov 21, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7758 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

Ind. No. 1735N/07 No. 175

11-21-2013

The People & c., Respondent, v. Martin Heidgen, Appellant.

Jillian S. Harrington, for appellant. Maureen McCormick, for respondent.


Jillian S. Harrington, for appellant.

Maureen McCormick, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's argument that his Alford plea should not have been accepted because the record does not contain strong evidence of his actual guilt is unpreserved for our review as he has neither moved to withdraw his plea nor to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545 [2007]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]).

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.


Summaries of

People v. Heidgen

Court of Appeals of New York
Nov 21, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7758 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Heidgen

Case Details

Full title:The People & c., Respondent, v. Martin Heidgen, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7758 (N.Y. 2013)