From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Heidgen

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 21, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7758 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-11-21

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Martin HEIDGEN, Appellant.

Jillian S. Harrington, New York City, for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola (Maureen McCormick, Tammy J. Smiley and Judith R. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.


Jillian S. Harrington, New York City, for appellant. Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola (Maureen McCormick, Tammy J. Smiley and Judith R. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant's argument that his Alford plea should not have been accepted becausethe record does not contain strong evidence of his actual guilt is unpreserved for our review as he has neither moved to withdraw his plea nor to vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Louree, 8 N.Y.3d 541, 545, 838 N.Y.S.2d 18, 869 N.E.2d 18 [2007]; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665–666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 [1988] ). Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. Heidgen

Court of Appeals of New York.
Nov 21, 2013
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7758 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Heidgen

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Martin HEIDGEN, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7758 (N.Y. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7758
22 N.Y.3d 981
2 N.E.3d 921

Citing Cases

People v. Hughes

al is belied by the record, which reflects that County Court made clear its "separate and distinct" nature,…

People v. Hafer

Defendant appeals. [1] Initially, defendant’s contention that County Court erred in accepting his Alford plea…