Opinion
February 8, 1988
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People, was legally sufficient to support the defendant's conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).
We have examined the remainder of the defendant's contentions, including the one raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Bracken and Spatt, JJ., concur.