From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Heasley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 29, 1987
133 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

October 29, 1987

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.).


Defendant contends that the plea allocution failed to establish all of the elements of the crime of burglary in the second degree. This issue, however, has not been preserved for appellate review since defendant neither moved to withdraw the plea before sentencing nor raised the issue by motion to vacate the judgment of conviction (see, People v. Claudio, 64 N.Y.2d 858; People v Vanier, 110 A.D.2d 980). In any event, if we were to consider this issue in the interest of justice we would find it meritless. The record reveals that facts constituting the essential elements of the crime were admitted by defendant during the plea colloquy.

Nor is there any merit in defendant's contention that County Court erred in not conducting a competency hearing of defendant in March 1986 (see, CPL 730.30). In November 1985, the court had committed defendant to the custody of the State Commissioner of Mental Hygiene. Following evaluation of defendant, the director of Rochester Psychiatric Center reported to the court in March 1986 that defendant was competent. No objection was made to this report and the record does not reveal circumstances which would have required the court to make further inquiry as to defendant's competency.

Judgment affirmed. Kane, J.P., Main, Mikoll, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Heasley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 29, 1987
133 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Heasley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROGER HEASLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 977 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Rusch

Under these circumstances, the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel simply because…