From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hazel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1985
109 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 18, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marano, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant's assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf. People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Titone, J.P., Thompson, O'Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hazel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 1985
109 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Hazel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY HAZEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)