From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hayon

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 4985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

No. 2022-01782

10-09-2024

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Joseph Hayon, appellant.

Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Alice R. B. Cullina of counsel; Matthew Vance on the brief), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Shlomit Heering of counsel), for respondent.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Alice R. B. Cullina of counsel; Matthew Vance on the brief), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Morgan J. Dennehy, and Shlomit Heering of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P. LARA J. GENOVESI CARL J. LANDICINO JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Danny K. Chun, J.), entered February 17, 2022, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant was convicted, upon a jury verdict, of 94 counts of possessing a sexual performance by a child (see People v Hayon, 211 A.D.3d 966). In this proceeding pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), the Supreme Court, after a hearing, assessed the defendant 95 points on the risk assessment instrument, denied his application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level, and designated him a level two sex offender. The defendant appeals.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his application for a downward departure. Although in some child pornography cases the assessment of points under risk factors 3 and 7 can result in an overassessment of a defendant's level of risk (see People v Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 860), a downward departure was not warranted under the circumstances of this case (see People v Benchocron, 226 A.D.3d 832, 833; People v Bustillo, 220 A.D.3d 814, 815; People v Capuano, 211 A.D.3d 860, 860).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender.

DILLON, J.P., GENOVESI, LANDICINO and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hayon

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 4985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

People v. Hayon

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Joseph Hayon…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 4985 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)