From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1998
695 N.E.2d 714 (N.Y. 1998)

Opinion

April 30, 1998

Joel Atlas, for appellant.

Tami J. Aisenson, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of grand larceny, fourth degree. There was evidence adduced at trial that defendant stole complainant's purse, which was hanging from the back of a chair on which she was seated. While sitting back in the chair, complainant felt the buckle on the purse strap being pulled across her back as defendant grabbed it. This evidence was sufficient to establish the "from the person" element of Penal Law § 155.30(5).

Defendant's remaining contention lacks merit.


Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Decided April 30, 1998


Summaries of

People v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 30, 1998
695 N.E.2d 714 (N.Y. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Haynes

Case Details

Full title:The People c., Respondent, v. Judy Haynes, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 30, 1998

Citations

695 N.E.2d 714 (N.Y. 1998)
695 N.E.2d 714
672 N.Y.S.2d 845

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rodriguez

In contrast to the Massachusetts statute at issue in De Jesus, New York law requires that the element of the…

State v. Williams

She further testified that she turned her head momentarily and, "when [she] looked back, [defendant] grabbed…