From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 11, 1981
85 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

December 11, 1981

Appeal from the Erie Supreme Court, Barr, J.

Present — Simons, J.P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: The People's witness Smith was a participant in the incident from which this robbery charge against defendant arose and he had pleaded guilty to robbery, third degree, in connection with the crime before defendant was indicted. It was error, therefore, for the court to fail to charge, over defendant's objection, that Smith was an accomplice, as a matter of law, whose testimony required corroboration (see People v Bell, 48 N.Y.2d 933; People v Minarich, 46 N.Y.2d 970; People v Werner, 55 A.D.2d 317). The People concede that the charge was erroneous but contend that the error was harmless. We are satisfied that in this case the error requires reversal.


Summaries of

People v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 11, 1981
85 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

People v. Hayes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEFFREY L. HAYES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1981

Citations

85 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

People v. Sweet

In the other cases, witnesses had, by their prior pleas, admitted their complicity and there was no mention…

People v. Santarelli

Such charge was blatantly inconsistent and confusing and, accordingly, erroneous. Contrary to the People's…