From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 1990
167 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 15, 1990

Appeal from the County Court of Broome County (Monserrate, J.).


Claiming that society's interest in retribution would be better served, defendant now seeks a reduction in his 4-to-8-year prison sentence to a term of 3 to 6 years. Given defendant's criminal record, which includes the fact that he was on probation when he committed this crime, we find that County Court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sentence (see, People v. Simoens, 159 A.D.2d 818, 820, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 743). In addition, the sentence was within the statutory guidelines and one to which defendant agreed; as such, it should not be reduced (see, People v. Neira, 130 A.D.2d 518, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 715).

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Haven

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 15, 1990
167 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Haven

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SCOTT HAVEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 878

Citing Cases

People v. Elliott

Defendant also argues that his sentence should be modified so that his prison terms run concurrently.…

People v. Davis

We disagree. Given the violent nature of defendant's crime, his prior criminal history and background, and…