From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hastings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2001
282 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued March 8, 2001.

April 5, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered June 2, 1998, convicting him of rape in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Marlow, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement authorities.

David Goodman, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, ANITA R. FLORIO, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly refused to suppress the defendant's statements. The defendant was informed of his Miranda rights (see, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436), understood these rights, and voluntarily waived them by continuing to speak with the officer. "Under these circumstances an implied Miranda waiver was established" (People v. Scott, 154 A.D.2d 719; see, People v. Sirno, 76 N.Y.2d 967; People v. Bridges, 226 A.D.2d 471; People v. Davis, 55 N.Y.2d 731).

In light of our determination, the defendant's remaining contention is academic.


Summaries of

People v. Hastings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2001
282 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Hastings

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. TIMOTHY HASTINGS, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
722 N.Y.S.2d 759

Citing Cases

People v. Niemann (Michael)

The People appeal and we reverse. The record amply supports the conclusion that by communicating with the…

People v. Gill

The hearing court properly declined to suppress the defendant's statements to law enforcement officials. The…