From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haskins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 1994
201 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

February 10, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.).


Defendant's contention that the court's alibi charge erroneously failed to instruct the jury that it could disbelieve the alibi and still acquit defendant is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, no objection to this aspect of the charge having been made at trial (CPL 470.05), and we decline to review the issue in the interest of justice. If we were to review, we would find that the charge, viewed as a whole, adequately conveyed the People's burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was the person who committed the crime charged. Also unpreserved as a matter of law for failure to make timely objection is defendant's contention that the prosecutor's summation improperly suggested that the alibi witness was the unapprehended perpetrator, and improperly denigrated the defense, and we decline to review such comments in respect to their purported effect on defendant's right to a fair trial. Were we to do so, we would find that the prosecutor's summation was fair comment on the evidence (see, People v Pacheco, 192 A.D.2d 319, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 1017). Finally, since defendant never requested the court to conduct an inquiry concerning a juror who was allegedly "nodding off" during the summation and charge, the record is insufficient to conclude "as a matter of law, that the trial court was required, in this instance, to determine whether the juror was `grossly unqualified' to render a verdict" (People v Ferguson, 165 A.D.2d 789, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 838).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ross, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Haskins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 10, 1994
201 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Haskins

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDRE HASKINS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1994

Citations

201 A.D.2d 322 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
607 N.Y.S.2d 323

Citing Cases

Smith v. Artus

As for the second guidepost, it is well-settled under New York law that the failure to timely object to a…

People v. Vega

Defendant failed to raise either of his claims of error in the jury charge below and they are not preserved…