From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1989
149 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 24, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence is granted, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the purpose of entering an order, in its discretion, pursuant to CPL 160.50. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The testimony at the suppression hearing disclosed that at approximately 11:50 P.M., two plain-clothes police officers in an unmarked patrol car observed the defendant walking along a Brooklyn street. The defendant was wearing an open jacket and a button-down shirt. One of the officers observed a bulge at the defendant's right waistband under his shirt. The officer who observed the bulge did not otherwise describe it. The officers made a U-turn in their vehicle, and came up behind the defendant. One of the officers began to get out of the vehicle, and as he "started to announce [him]self as a police officer", the defendant ran. The officer pursued the defendant, seized him from behind in a bear hug, and felt a very heavy object where he had seen the bulge. Believing that the object was a gun, the officer plunged his hand into the defendant's waistband, and removed a handgun. A subsequent search of the defendant at the precinct revealed the presence of cocaine and drug paraphernalia on his person.

Contrary to the hearing court's determination, we find that under the circumstances herein, the officers did not have either reasonable suspicion to justify a stop and frisk (see, People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759; People v. Marquez, 80 A.D.2d 837), or probable cause to believe that criminal activity was afoot (see, People v. Howard, 50 N.Y.2d 583, cert denied 449 U.S. 1023; People v. Archie, 136 A.D.2d 553, lv dismissed 71 N.Y.2d 892). Accordingly, since the police officers' conduct was unlawful, all of the evidence recovered as a result thereof must be suppressed and the indictment dismissed (see also, People v. Wilkerson, 64 N.Y.2d 749). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 24, 1989
149 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALEXANDER HARRIS, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 24, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
540 N.Y.S.2d 514

Citing Cases

People v. Stevenson

Initially, it is noted that the defendant did not waive his right to appeal at the time of the plea. Contrary…

People v. Severino

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the defendant's motion to suppress physical evidence is…