From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

September 29, 1995

Appeal from the Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that, although the sentence imposed was the result of a plea bargain, we should reduce the sentence in the interest of justice. Given the serious nature of the crime and defendant's participation therein, and our affirmance of the judgments of conviction of the three codefendants (People v Gianzero, 216 A.D.2d 961; People v Bletson, 210 A.D.2d 1013, lv denied 85 N.Y.2d 936; People v Parks, 210 A.D.2d 1014), we decline to exercise our discretion to reduce the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [b]).


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 29, 1995
219 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS L. HARRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 29, 1995

Citations

219 A.D.2d 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 1020