Opinion
February 24, 1956
Judgment unanimously reversed, the fine remitted and a new trial ordered. (See People v. Oak, 283 App. Div. 1018, and People v. Pierson, 279 App. Div. 509.)
Concur — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Frank, JJ.
February 24, 1956
Judgment unanimously reversed, the fine remitted and a new trial ordered. (See People v. Oak, 283 App. Div. 1018, and People v. Pierson, 279 App. Div. 509.)
Concur — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Frank, JJ.
Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EMMETT HARRIS…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Feb 24, 1956
Judgment of conviction reversed and a new trial ordered. ( People v. Oak, 283 App. Div. 1018; People v.…
People v. CrosslandThe issue before us is whether or not a police officer, testifying as an expert in a prosecution for…