From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 21, 1995
213 A.D.2d 265 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alvin Schlesinger, J.).


Contrary to defendant's claim, the "moral certainty" standard of review is not available to an appellate court in deciding an insufficiency claim (People v. Williams, 84 N.Y.2d 925). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Acosta, 80 N.Y.2d 665, 672), and giving deference to the jury's findings of credibility (People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495), we conclude that defendant's guilt was proved by legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Three plainclothes officers observed defendant and his two accomplices over a fifteen minute period as they pointed to the pockets and pocketbooks of other potential victims, and gestured and spoke to each other. When the assailants converged upon the victim, who was carrying his daughter on his shoulder, defendant and one accomplice positioned themselves on either side of the victim and "bumped and pushed" him immediately before the third accomplice reached into the victim's pocket, dragged him to the ground and removed $2. As they fled from the scene, defendant and one of his cohorts kept looking back at the crime scene.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 21, 1995
213 A.D.2d 265 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEVEN HARRIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 265 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 20

Citing Cases

People v. Shabazz

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There…