Opinion
April 3, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On the instant appeal the defendant argues that the trial court committed reversible error by allowing into evidence a photograph of the murder victim shown tied to his bed and by permitting the People to question the defendant about his heroin addiction. We disagree with the defendant's arguments.
The admission into evidence of a photograph depicting the murder victim, a frail, elderly man tied to the post of his bed, was proper. Photographs of a corpse which tend to prove or disprove some material fact in issue are admissible even though they may tend to arouse passion and resentment against the defendant in the minds of the jury (see, People v. Bell, 63 N.Y.2d 796; People v. Pobliner, 32 N.Y.2d 356). The photograph of the decedent which was admitted into evidence served to corroborate testimony adduced from the appellant's former girlfriend which revealed that he had admitted to her that the victim had been tied to his bed in the course of the commission of the crime.
Furthermore, the court properly allowed the prosecutor to question the defendant as to whether he was addicted to heroin. It is well settled that trial courts have broad discretion in deciding whether a prosecutor should be precluded from impeaching a defendant's credibility by reference to prior immoral, vicious or criminal acts, and no improvident exercise of discretion took place here (see, People v. McClain, 107 A.D.2d 765). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.