From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harper

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 29, 2016
498 Mich. 968 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 152114. COA No. 319942.

01-29-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Henry Richard HARPER, Defendant–Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion holding that it cannot be concluded that the two separate assaults constituted part of the “same transaction” under MCL 750.520b(3). We agree, however, that the sentencing judge failed to identify specific evidence from which one could conclude that the imposition of consecutive sentences was warranted. We therefore REMAND this case to the Kent Circuit Court. On remand, the trial court shall either issue an order that provides a basis for its conclusion that the two criminal offenses arose from the same transaction, or impose concurrent sentences.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Harper

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 29, 2016
498 Mich. 968 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Harper

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Henry Richard…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jan 29, 2016

Citations

498 Mich. 968 (Mich. 2016)
873 N.W.2d 304

Citing Cases

People v. Harper

We summarized the facts underlying defendant's convictions in our first unpublished opinion:People v Harper,…

People v. Harper

We vacate defendant's sentences and remand for resentencing. People v Harper, unpublished opinion per curiam…