Opinion
B164078.
7-2-2003
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JORGE LOPEZ HARO, Defendant and Appellant.
M. Eileen McGarry, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Defendant and appellant Jorge Lopez Haro appeals from the judgment after a jury trial in which he was convicted of second degree burglary of vehicle (Pen. Code, § 459). He was placed on three years probation and ordered to serve 365 days in county jail. We appointed counsel to represent him on appeal.
After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised. Appellants counsel advised him he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. On May 2, 2003, we advised appellant he had 30 days within which to file a supplemental brief. No response has been received to date.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and no arguable issues exist. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 278-284, 145 L. Ed. 2d 756, 120 S. Ct. 746; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441, 158 Cal. Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071.)
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: TURNER, P. J., and MOSK, J.