From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hargroves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted June 25, 1999

October 18, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.).


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain his conviction is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Angus, 192 A.D.2d 665; People v. Fields, 188 A.D.2d 612). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

S. MILLER, J.P., SULLIVAN, ALTMAN, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hargroves

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Hargroves

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. BRANDON HARGROVES, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 502 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 708