From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hares

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-07-02

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Terry L. HARES, Defendant–Appellant.

Williams, Heinl, Moody & Buschman, P.C., Auburn (Ryan James Muldoon of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Jon E. Budelmann, District Attorney, Auburn (Nathan J. Garland of Counsel), for Respondent.



Williams, Heinl, Moody & Buschman, P.C., Auburn (Ryan James Muldoon of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Jon E. Budelmann, District Attorney, Auburn (Nathan J. Garland of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DeJOSEPH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her, upon her guilty plea, of fraudulent practices (Workers' Compensation Law § 114[1] ), welfare fraud in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 158.05) and misuse of food stamps (Social Services Law § 147[1][a][i] ). Pursuant to the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant to concurrent terms of probation, ordered her to pay restitution in the amount of $12,176.50, and issued an order of forfeiture with respect to her right to receive workers' compensation benefits. Defendant asks us to vacate the order of forfeiture as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( seeCPL 470.15[3][c] ), contending that it is unfair for her to be barred from receiving workers ' compensation benefits in the future for her existing back injury. The record establishes, however, that the order of forfeiture was part of the People's plea offer, which defendant voluntarily accepted, and, in view of the fact that defendant has a prior conviction of welfare fraud, the People may have asked the court for a harsher sentence if she had not agreed to the forfeiture. In addition, we note that, despite her alleged back disability, defendant was able to earn unreported income as a cage dancer, which involved physical activity that included hanging upside down from bars. Under the circumstances, we decline to vacate the agreed-upon order of forfeiture.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Hares

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jul 2, 2015
130 A.D.3d 1500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Hares

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Terry L. HARES…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 2, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 1500 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
130 A.D.3d 1500
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5849