From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1993
199 A.D.2d 49 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 7, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Silverman, J.).


CPL 30.30 (4) (a) provides that delay resulting from other proceedings concerning the defendant constitutes excludable time. The trial court properly found that there was no speedy trial violation and excluded the time during which the People were prepared to go forward on this indictment while defendant was tried on another indictment. Nor does CPL 30.30 impose an obligation on the People to be in regular contact with each of their witnesses while a defendant's other cases wind their way through the criminal justice system.

The court's charge, on the jurors' obligation to harmonize their views, was fair and balanced and did not suggest that jurors should surrender a conscientiously held belief (see, People v Ali, 65 A.D.2d 513, 514, affd 47 N.Y.2d 920).

We have examined defendant's remaining claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 7, 1993
199 A.D.2d 49 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDRE HARDY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 7, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 49 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 23

Citing Cases

People v. Reed

The motion court excluded the entire adjournment based upon the agreement between the parties to try…