From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 30, 1997
245 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 30, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Howard Bell, J., on motion; Michael Corriero, J., at jury trial and sentence).


Defendant's written application, upon which he did not seek to elaborate, did not contain an unequivocal request to proceed pro se (see, People v. Rodriguez, 98 A.D.2d 961, 962, lv denied 61 N.Y.2d 911, cert denied 469 U.S. 818). In any event, the court's ruling on defendant's pro se status was limited to pretrial proceedings, and defendant abandoned any request he might have made, when eight months passed before hearings or trial, new counsel was appointed and defendant never renewed his "request" to proceed pro se (see, People v. Douglas, 227 A.D.2d 130, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 965).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Harding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 30, 1997
245 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Harding

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH HARDING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 903

Citing Cases

People v. Hirschfeld

In any event, during the pendency of defendant's motion he retained new counsel and proceeded with the trial,…