From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hardee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2011
84 A.D.3d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 2010-05647.

May 3, 2011.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Hubert, J.), rendered May 6, 2010, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Clinton W. Calhoun III, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Lois Cullen Valerio and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Austin and Roman, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution ( see People v Brown, 78 AD3d 723; People v Johnson, 73 AD3d 951).

Since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea, his current contention that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v LeGrady, 50 AD3d 1059, 1060). In any event, the record reveals that the defendant's plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently ( see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536; People v Hollingsworth, 74 AD3d 1359).


Summaries of

People v. Hardee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2011
84 A.D.3d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

People v. Hardee

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HARDEE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 3877
922 N.Y.S.2d 785

Citing Cases

People v. Taylor

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion to vacate his judgment of conviction on…

People v. Taylor

People v Peque, 22 NY3d 168; see People v Chacko, 119 AD3d 955; People v Vargas, 117 AD3d 885; People v…