From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Harbison

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 4, 2017
154 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

10-04-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Stephan HARBISON, also known as Stephan L. Harbison, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Elizabeth Miller of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Elizabeth Miller of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), rendered August 26, 2015, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to conduct a proper inquiry into his postplea arrest before imposing an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review ( People v. Stafford, 115 A.D.3d 683, 981 N.Y.S.2d 566 ), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Harbison

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 4, 2017
154 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Harbison

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Stephan HARBISON, also known as Stephan…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 4, 2017

Citations

154 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
154 A.D.3d 715