From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Present — Green, J.P., Fallon, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Motion to extend time to take appeal denied. Memorandum: Defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 460.30 (1) for an extension of time to take an appeal based upon defendant's inability to communicate with trial counsel concerning whether to take an appeal does not comply with the requirements of CPL 460.30 (2). That subdivision requires that the motion papers "contain sworn allegations of facts claimed to establish the * * * inability to communicate, or other facts essential to support the motion". Defendant failed to set forth the requisite facts in support of his motion. Therefore, we deny defendant's motion with leave to renew in compliance with CPL 460.30 (2).


Summaries of

People v. Hanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Hanson

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. GEORGE HANSON, Defendant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1126 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
636 N.Y.S.2d 702