From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hankerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 29, 2018
166 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

7751 Ind. 3075/01

11-29-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ralph HANKERSON, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Abigail Everett of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Katherine Kulkarni of counsel), for respondent.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, JJ.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). The underlying sex crime was committed under egregious circumstances, and defendant did not establish that his health problems were so serious that they would minimize the likelihood of recidivism (see e.g. People v. Portalatin, 145 A.D.3d 463, 41 N.Y.S.3d 712 [1st Dept. 2016] ) or that his age warranted a downward departure.


Summaries of

People v. Hankerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 29, 2018
166 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

People v. Hankerson

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ralph Hankerson…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 29, 2018

Citations

166 A.D.3d 569 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 8189
86 N.Y.S.3d 875

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriquez

tigating factor by a preponderance of the evidence, the court must exercise its discretion by weighing the…

People v. Foy

The mitigating factors cited by defendant, including his age at the time of the offense and his…